See what's hot on Bookmarks@MarkupDancing, or go to Poppular Tags.
saved on 2011-07-28 13:47:46
We launched Mozilla Labs’ online identity experiment, BrowserID, only 24 hours ago, and the feedback has been incredibly useful already. At Mozilla, we believe in empowering individuals to shape their online experience. Our work on a decentralized identity solution for the Web matches that mission well. Also, because we believe that transparent community-based processes promote participation, accountability, and trust, we will be posting technical explanations, points of debate, and roadmaps on this blog.
saved on 2011-01-05 14:09:30
One effective label that has often been used during the first two years of the Obama administration is the “looming spectrum crisis.” FCC Chairman Genachowski said in October 2009: “I believe that that the biggest threat to the future of mobile in America is the looming spectrum crisis.”[23] As the crisis loomed, the administration—worried about the lack of spectrum allocated for high-speed Internet access—declared it would re-allocate 500 MHz of spectrum.[24] There is a hunt on for spectrum: Every closet in every agency is being searched. Looming. Crisis. It may be time for yet another label to enter the lists: “the looming cable monopoly.” It is gaining strength, and it is not terribly interested in the future of the Internet. This is the central crisis of our communications era.
saved on 2011-01-05 13:45:46
In McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission 1995 the Supreme Court overturned a statute requiring any person who prints a notice or flyer promoting a candidate or an issue to identify the communication’s author by name. Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority, grounded his opinion in an account of meaning he takes from an earlier case First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti: “The inherent worth of . . . speech in terms of its capacity for informing the public does not depend upon the identity of its source, whether corporation, association, union, or individual.” Or, in other words, a writing or utterance says what it says independently of who happens to say it; the information conveyed does not vary with the identification of the speaker. There are at least two problems with this reasoning. First, it is not true that a text’s meaning is the same whether or not its source is known. Suppose I receive an anonymous note asserting that I have been betrayed by a friend. I will not know what to make of it — is it a cruel joke, a slander, a warning, a test? But if I manage to identify the note’s author — it’s a friend or an enemy or a known gossip — I will be able to reason about its meaning because I will know what kind of person composed it and what motives that person might have had.
saved on 2010-12-27 09:55:32
The situation is further obfuscated by the fact that the two firms are increasingly competing directly in offering internet transit to businesses and content delivery for media firms, among other services. Comcast, once just a broadband provider, cable television operator and VoIP carrier, is awaiting approval on a plan to acquire NBC Universal, with its vast trove of television programming and archives, as well as a movie library. For its part, Level 3 is no longer the backbone firm of yore, moving bits efficiently among networks. Deals like its recent one with Netflix mean that it, too, is diversifying into the provision of content.
saved on 2010-12-23 23:36:07
3年前の記事だが、遅ればせながら一票投じよう(笑)。
アフォーダンス。 両手の平を地面と水平に、腰のあたりで上下させてしまう人が私の他にもいると信じたい。 どうだろうか?(弱気)
saved on 2010-12-21 10:30:21
Despite this mixed record, social media have become coordinating tools for nearly all of the world's political movements, just as most of the world's authoritarian governments (and, alarmingly, an increasing number of democratic ones) are trying to limit access to it. In response, the U.S. State Department has committed itself to "Internet freedom" as a specific policy aim. Arguing for the right of people to use the Internet freely is an appropriate policy for the United States, both because it aligns with the strategic goal of strengthening civil society worldwide and because it resonates with American beliefs about freedom of expression. But attempts to yoke the idea of Internet freedom to short-term goals -- particularly ones that are country-specific or are intended to help particular dissident groups or encourage regime change -- are likely to be ineffective on average. And when they fail, the consequences can be serious.
saved on 2010-12-13 14:13:31
Deliciousからの移設ブックマークです。
saved on 2010-12-10 22:00:52
Deliciousからの移設ブックマークです。
saved on 2010-10-22 00:20:22
Deliciousからの移設ブックマークです。